🔗 Share this article

This is Black History Month in the United Kingdom, and it appears it’s time for a rethink. Over the years, an event that began as a festivity and recollection of history, culture and the connections between international African diaspora communities, has developed a corporate feel, expanding to include gatherings where Black people are compensated to talk to predominantly white listeners about “unconscious bias” and supportive partnership. The anti-racism rallies of the last decade created a surge in the enterprise of displaying cultural sensitivity. However, that period has concluded. The tide has crested, resulting in a somewhat empty inheritance of what promoting consciousness is for.

The Origins of Black History Observance

Initially celebrated in the America and its northern neighbor, Black History Month was created in 1962 as an observance of African American heritage by historian of African descent Carter G. Woodson with seven days of commemoration and observance in the second week of February. Black History Month grew out of this movement and was officially launched in 1970. Currently it is marked not only in the US and Canada in winter, but also in October in the UK, Germany, the Republic of Ireland and the Netherlands.

The period has evolved since those days, focusing less on the histories of transatlantic enslavement and fights for racial justice, and increasingly on influential individuals of color in government, the arts, and social movements, and broadly celebrating the input Black people have made to shape the country. It is in schools where Black History Month is most frequently marked, with discussions and heritage festivities. But the method the month is commemorated is a indication of the contemporary political context. How it develops is a valuable example in how appropriation leads to weakening: the reshaping of Black History Month has impeded the purpose of it, which is to address structural and organizational discrimination.

---

A Disconcerting Period

Little demonstrates how critical it is to reconsider Black History Month more than the current time in which it falls this year. In the United Kingdom, a revitalized conservative movement in the shape of the Reform party is leading the polls. In the summer we witnessed the biggest extreme right demonstration in the history of Britain. a prominent political figure, the African descendant in charge of the right-wing political group, is a firm opponent of the racial justice movement, and we are in a position where a elected representative feels emboldened to state that the absence of Caucasian individuals in parts of a city is a reason for concern. Simultaneously, ultra-nationalist movements are growing in Europe as a whole.

In the America, a colossal assault against inclusion programs and preferential policies has been carried, often successfully, to the supreme judicial bodies of the state. A effort to remove the history of people of color and narrative from the historical documents is in progress. One of the former president's initial presidential directives targeted the institution dedicated to Black heritage, and the renowned cultural organization, alleging that they of a “concerted and widespread effort to rewrite our Nation’s history” by portraying America “as naturally discriminatory”.

In this context, the celebration represents how insufficiently it can be influential if it is confined to either obligatory business commemorations, or politically neutered festivities of former accomplishments, rather than challenging the realities of the contemporary world. It also shows how its limited duration means that it is disconnected from the more extensive continuous action that is necessary. An academic expert, a educator at an educational institution, expressed it perfectly when she raised concerns about the short-term symbolic gestures of the month. “The problem with taking a tokenistic approach”, she stated, “is that it often means that Black History Month becomes a transient display rather than a driver of transformation.”

---

Reevaluating, Not Abandoning

Establishing how to adapt, revise and extend efforts for fair treatment and appreciation in such periods of dismay and anxiety is a difficult task. There is a inclination to just discontinue events including Black History Month altogether, believing they are simply not fit for purpose, or are vestiges of an time that has been ineffective.

However, regardless of the situation, Black History Month, and in fact the whole broad system and legacy of activism for racial justice – grassroots Black Lives Matter organisations, DEI programs, and yes, even those talks to businesses – form an infrastructure that a significant effort has been invested in. It is there not just to decay as the politics moves on (and in fact, deteriorates), but to be a living breathing thing.

So what would a fresh vibrant Black History Month seem? To begin with, it would be extended beyond a brief observance: something that is dispersed throughout the annual calendar (as certain organizations are already starting to implement), elements of its material (particularly around historic Black characters) included in school curriculums. It would also be a era that does not shy away from political issues, and leaves space for citizens, particularly young people, to air their fears and experiences. What purpose serves simple recognition of the history when it doesn’t reckon with the current situation of ultra-nationalist gatherings in the street? Institutions who mark it should not be comforted with the non-confrontational words of “unconscious bias” and alertness to “microaggressions”, but faced with the dangers that affect everyone if anti-racism is not treated with importance. In short, Black History Month should be made contemporary, urgent, and reactive. It could be that an complete renaming is required – Contemporary Black History Month.